Sex with cavemen gave humans an immune boost: study
The latest caveman DNA story above is even more evidence that modern humans and cavemen interbred, and that women prefer sexually aggressive sex partners. That is, if you believe the caveman stereotype.
But perhaps it is the other way around, and men prefer sexually aggressive females? We may never know, because women’s groups and feminists work so hard at denying actual, physical violence and aggression perpetrated by females, despite decades of evidence demonstrating that women are at least, or more aggressive than men.
We may never know because feminism in any western country is based in logical fallacies , and false dilemas that pervade diaolgues, and deny the power of kyriarchy.
But one thing is certain: it is literally in the financial interests of feminists and their allies in science to deny women’s violence, and perpetuate the sexist stereotypes of women as ‘helpless victims,’ rather than as capable people–there’s money to be made in perpetuation.
I should back up a bit: I don’t want to be accused of sexism by all of those sexists –(have you ever noticed how sexist the people who point out sexism actually are)?
So it would be more fair to point out that modern humans interbred with cavepeople, in this case the Denisovan group of ancestors.
We already knew that we are related to Neanderthals–who actually get a bad rap for violence, because of the sexist biases of modern scientists like Greg Laden,who maintain that Neanderthals were all rapists, despite evidence that they were spiritual and compassionate, and also evidence they took care of the handicapped amongst them.
Sex-biased scientists are almost as disreputable as religious ones, and fanatics who believe the cavemen lived alongside dinosaurs, and ‘went to heaven.’ But you have to take science with a grain of salt these days, as the left/right religious and sexist wars rage through the facts.
So the stereotype prevails that cavemen were a brutal, male dominated species, and the stereotype waxes and wanes in currency, because some women are also financially invested in the idea of perpetuating the image of women as vulnerable, and helpless–which is anti-feminist–despite their own claims to the contrary!
Advancements of women who have at least, their own powerful identities, separate from monolithic feminism are nearly antithetical to the rape and rapeology industries that thrive and prosper in academia, government, and social services.
This type of feminist minces words or concepts like “nature versus nurture,” and act like its all one grand mystery how sexism is perpetuated (clue to feminist moms: stop treating your own daughter like a sex object), while pimping their daughters to middle class paradigms of ‘beauty’ and ‘ frailty’ in need of ‘protection’ from cavemen.
Nature and nurture are complex, and not simply explained from either a genetic, or a psychological reasoning, because social forces intervene in each. The bias of scientists selects for or against explaining this complexity–the religious doubt the genetic explanation, the sexists doubt the religious explanations, and both mangle the social implications of the discussion.
Psychological perspective: http://psychology.about.com/od/nindex/g/nature-nurture.htm
Psychological-genetic explanation: http://psychology.wikia.com/wiki/Nature_nurture
“We do several moves where you stop your opponents,” said Brittany Delgado. “My sister and I are very proficient wrestlers and also played football in high school, so we know about tackling.”
My best guess is that these young ladies weren’t raised by feminists per se, or at least that kind of feminist– or scientists. I would guess they were raised by loving parents who were aware of the interplay between nature and nurture, as well as the biases in each corner.
But one thing is certain: the Delgado girls can probably handle themselves in any elevator–unlike young, white, middle class feminists raised by other middle class sex pandering feminists[see links at bottom for "elevators"] who sexualized their daughters.
As long as sexism and science are blurred with feminism, we may never know what women, or our own DNA really are made of, because like religion, there’s just way too much money to be made in arguing about it, and perpetuating false rape scenarios, and Virgin Mary complexes, rather than getting our human groove on–cave person style.
- Sex with Neanderthals boosted human immunity (cbc.ca)
- Neanderthal sex boost to immunity (bbc.co.uk)
- Study: Sex with Neanderthals likely strengthened human immune system (digitaltrends.com)
- Cavemen Sex Gave Humans an Immune Boost? (foxnews.com)
- The downside of sex with Neanderthals (guardian.co.uk)
- The Neanderthal in most of us revealed (sfgate.com)
- Neanderthal genome inherited by humans, study says (sfgate.com)
- Nookie with Neanderthals may have pumped up immune systems (theglobeandmail.com)
- You Can Thank Human-Neanderthal Relations for Your Strong Immune System (suburbanmen.com)
- Sex with Neanderthals ‘gave humans immune boost’ – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) (adelaidegreenporridgecafe.blogspot.com)
- Canoodling with cavemen gave healthy boost to human genome, Stanford study finds (eurekalert.org)
- Denisovans, Neanderthals and Modern Humans (thebibleistheotherside.wordpress.com)
- Thanks for the Immunity DNA, Neanderthals (bigthink.com)