Posts Tagged ‘sex negative feminism’

A chart showing the avalability of food in the...

Food pyramid or secret symbol !!!????

Staring at a blank white page has never been my problem ; but staring out into the void that precedes reception and receivers is petrifying.

I literally have nothing to say to ‘ordinary’, or ‘normal’ people.

Hoi, polloi–How’s that?

Just me again, not normal, as usual.

Yeah, I thought I would lose you there, and I did. Go away now, and relish your normalcy with catch up; I never had that common gift to bring to the table, and never will.

I HATE furniture.

There’s privilege for you–I’m so special, right? Predictable, you are. What a luxury.

I am personally, and so full of myself; I can just die, but I can’t find the painless method or gizzard enough pebbles to croak; as you think I am trying to  compare.

Competition is the active verb waggling at the cock headed idolatry of the middle classes, a tall church on every corner, and stained glass shards put together to form myth pictures that keep the ladies and all their children from falling asleep between their sighs.

So fuck your God, in it’s huge ass with shards of glass, and spear heads. I live for creation, your God died for your sins, and shits them out everywhere upon me.

Sins are a luxury in a world where sins are predictable, and then forgotten. Until they are remembered, by omniscient, consequent, not-at-all selective lottery picks, and named, gendered names.

I can’t forget luxury, here on the side of the river, wondering if they are coming for me yet.

That guy upriver lived in a cave, after prison, and then, the city kicked HIM out for ‘disorderly house‘ or something deeper.

And that millstone is grinding, killing me. Again.

While you are structuring glass arguments, housed by monolithic pillars, and lots and lots of the hoi polloi to sing the paean for you, who aren’t aptly appointed to count the cost of forgetting the overall structure .

I hope that works out for you, while your thighs rub there, fat like a cricket before my beak.

I think the frogs can have you this morning, or another bird.
You’ll fly, alright, to heaven–as it shits you out its sphincter, a pip, then a splat from high altitude.

I wonder what THAT would look like on paper?

I would read it, for one, as graffiti on a monolith.

Have you heard of the Dear Woman campaign, which stems from the Manifesto for Conscious Men? The idiocy of a generation of middle class white people who are suffering from gynorhea after consorting with the feminist monolith, is palpable only when I watch this crap.

Here are some middle class, sensationalist gender panderers; the Oprafied, nutless mangina’s responsible, from Franc Hoggle’s site greylining.wordpress.com

  • Gay Hendricks, Oprah Winfrey regular and founder of the Hendricks Institute, who abandoned academic life for the goldmine of the self-help industry for the feeble minded. Also a pioneer in Radiance Breathing Meditation, which has earned him a series of honourable mentions at Quackwatch.

At first pass I was fully expecting the queen of man haters, John Stoltenberg2, to have been the captain of this ship, but he is not credited.”

I couldn’t have said it better myself.

The campaign is a bunch of men apologizing for all men for the stuff that men do–even if they didn’t do it: “I may not have done bad things to you myself, many of the men who abused you may not be living; on behalf of my gender, I apologize for what religions created a thousand years ago have done to you….I apologize to you…” blahblahblah.

*puke* puke* puke* Franc Hoggle is still wiping up his dungeon floor after this vomit soaked male-apologist B.S.

The only thing more pathetic than this kind of sabotage of reality, and real human centered activism IS MAYBE A PICTURE OF FABIO ON THE COVER OF A ROMANCE NOVEL, LAYING NEXT TO A DILDO ON OPRAH’S QUEEN SIZED JACUZZI.

But fortunately, Will Ferrell is there to give us hope.

And the reply from fake guru Ardagh to Ferrell:

I can’t add anything other than what has already been said by others. Here is a good from someone responding to the video above:

“Oh yea, anger and resentment. Let me tell you what this really is about….dollar dollar bill y’all…The next step in the strategy of the “Dear Woman” campaign would most likely be to capture as many of the audience and convince them that through a modest contribution they would be absolved of all past transgressions as an authorized “Conscious man”. for a mere 19.95 + tax and shipping….gimme a break. posted by: chameleoncass”

Below is yet another reply from Ardagh and Hendricks, milking the Will Ferrell connection for all it is worth:

Comment: “thanks Will Ferrell for your ability to recognize the humor in this con.”

And here is the actual video–try not to laugh at the asinine whining of these idiots, and have an airplane bag ready for the barf afterwards.

“Based on the “Manifesto for Conscious Men,” a collectively-written document from a number of men who feel deep appreciation for the gifts of the feminine as a balance to those of the masculine. This document acknowledges many thousands of years of dominance of masculine power, and offers an apology for the suppression of women, in the spirit of a fresh start. The authors do not advocate the domination of men by women or feminine energy, but feel that a balance and equal respect for both energies will allow for a new wave of evolution on our planet.”

”]Photograph by Wanda. A RealDoll with face #11

Some women HATE robots, and some think robots are a sexual threat to women who sell, and barter sex, against the interests of your independence from women.

That kind of woman benefits when male, violence oriented, female dependent robots rape and kill people, like Donald Rumsfeld, et al.

Does the fact that we barely even now have a male pill, and the other fact–which is that women–and maybe even your mom– have been vibrating their vagina’s with battery powered dildos since at least the 60’s–contravene the possibility that female looking sex robots can satisfy men more than real women, who prefer dildos, real men, or who cut deals with Donald Rumsfeld?

If anything, the ethical debate should be the price point. Women can buy a vibrator for anywhere from 10 bucks to a cool Ben Franklin. But a sex robot for men? Think ‘used car’  price range.

I am wondering: what kind of women are so desperate for penis that they need to invent ways to attract male attention to themselves? Aren’t false rape claims enough?

Are women generally cannibalistic, craving male flesh in odd ways? You can ask a scientist, here.

But at what point do we say that some women’s obsessions with controlling penises is cannibalistic, or just, um…weird, possessive,  and– controlling? Aren’t the boys that women raise together enough of a sperm supply for that kind of woman to share, so that robots should be seen as what they are, mere machines?

I bet the ones gnashing their teeth are the women who are competing with robots for sexual attention, the white middle class, and gender feminists,. who routinely try to speak for womenof color as if what affects white women affects all women.

Important feminist topics–like SEX ROBOTS

Compare this video below with Roxxy, the white woman sex robot in the picture above, and ask yourself: Isn’t a world full of Roxxy’s scary as hell, and kind of creepy compared to an Aiko?

The women who try to legislate sex must be the scared and illogical ones, the mean girls, or the real inwardly ugly girls, or the white ones who feel like their privilege is fading away, or just getting old. Or maybe they are women who are tired of selling it, and realize the market no longer demands whatever they “have to offer.”

And they are likely the same ones who pimp us young girls in fashion, and then stand back and act appalled, and claim the kid was ‘sexualized’

Modern feminists: they’re so confused…

Either way, it seems Asian men are way past us in robotics, and redefining possibilities beyond droll, sperm donating competitions for companionship with white or westernized women, and their definitions of “family” [read: woman in possession of house, car, bank account, and child; man in possession of none of his right mind, or an awareness of the exponential value of his own sperm].

But really: so-called feminists, and fauxminists defending false rape accusers and legislating or moralizing over robo-sex?? Shit, what will they say if every time I broke out my high powered electric wood sander I get a little to close to the sanding table; or whether or not my Vespa‘s muffler is too loose?–and will there soon be warning labels on vacuum cleaners too?

“USE OF THIS DEVICE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE CONSENT, OR AGREEMENT TO BE USED FOR A SEXUAL PURPOSE. CALL 1-800-KISS-MOM for legal guidance, sexual information and resources”

I am sure that label will be immediately understood by this latest crop of young men raised by fauxminists and manginas, who willingly–at least, as willingly as young boys who were primarily raised by women can be willing– legislate their own sexual safety and sexual rights away– but it doesn’t do much for the rest of human kind.

Defending false rape accusers, or conflating robo-sex with rights is tantamount to defending rapists, or defending Donald Rumsfeld,who authorized the torture of innocent United States civilians.

In fact, defending false rape accusers is WORSE than defending rapists because criminals at least are protected by legal guarantees against slander, whereas false rape accusers–who are criminals–are defended by anonymity, the western burqa.

Because defending false rape accusers takes place outside the courts, and inside the realm of ‘public opinion,’ meaning innocent men who are accused of rape, are tried outside the legal process, while false rape accusers are protected with legal anonymity.( except here, where I shame them)

Men who are falsely accused of rape are left open to attack, because every false rape claim is the legal equivalent of ‘extra-legal’, socially approved slander, with the accused being paraded through perp-walks,and newspaper headlines, until a phony case is dismissed. A brilliant feminist strategy of destroying men, but a sad error of legal reasoning that needs redress.

And equating frisky fingers with rape is just plain old sex-negative, money, and jealousy based radical feminist ideology.

[Update: Prosecutors are dropping any and all charges against Dominique Strauss-Kahn as I write this. He was accused of rape by Naffisatou Diallo, a woman who has admitted connections to laundering drug money, and falsely claiming that she was a rape victim in other countries]

But there still is NO WAY you can defend Donald Rumsfeld, because people who are above the law–where the rest of us live–are not deserving of the protections of the law.

So, if sex robots are a big issue, maybe we can invent one to soothe Donald Rumsfelds aching ass–G-d knows it needs a discussion about ethics.

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


This critical paper by Susanne Dodillet and Petra Ostergren is a bedrock of critical analysis of the hypocrisy of gender feminist reality constructs, gate keeping, and selective truth telling, and an analysis of the sloppy science of sex-negative fauxminists. This and a host of other discrepancies in truth telling have sex positive feminists taking note of the drives of sex negative, gender feminist assaults against women’s rights.

Gender feminists are actively engaged in “marketing to women”, and women’s rights, while having a net effect of leveraging, and then actually “marketing women” or in the least, selling them to power and power structures, circumventing women’s rights, and choices and womens abilities to define themselves:
The study further emphasizes the discrepancy between gender and radical feminist interpretations of the data, which negates( renders negative) the reality that ACTUAL sex workers face. Academics, politicians, and social gatekeepers who make their living from talking about sex workers, or those claiming moral high ground by falsely claiming–and ironically paternalistically/ maternalistically*  claiming that they speak for all women do not accurately or honestly represent the anecdotal facts of the sex workers experiences or the views of society at large. Notice the prominence of a “marketing strategy” below:

Most notably, the research that gender feminists used to lobby for the law, and to circumscribe other women’s bodies was flawed, non-factual, sloppy, and typical of a trend in feminist literature, science, and statistical evidence creation.

Others have noted in the critique of the law that its foundation was marked by deception, and current work was looking at the typical and egregious gender feminist biases and-


Equity feminists and other social critics are not alone in noticing the “herding effect**” of gender feminist involvement in the rhetoric of choice, with a direct and linear goal of “controlling the sex supply***.”  Nor are women, sex workers, and ordinary observers alone in noticing that the net effect of such two-faced laws and the studies that are funded in their name is to benefit a few at the expense of many.

More insidiously, this particular crop of ‘feminists’ have a stated goal of harm reduction, but flagrantly cause harm, according to the Swedish social work model of harm reduction strategies in social work:

The Swedish Model of prostitution is a dismal failure because gender feminists seek to gain exclusive access to the courts, the laws, and women’s bodies by falsely, and harmfully manipulating data, selectively promoting sex for sale, and effectively, and detrimentally,  limiting sex workers rights and sexual choices.


Or, in other words, they sure are re a bunch of phoney dicks, chasing the skirts of women and children in Sweden.
*Microsoft spell checker recognizes paternalistically as a word, but DOES NOT recognize maternalistically as a word!  In the interests of fairness, spell checker also does not recognize the word “phoney”.

**Herding effect is when bulls, or cows cordon off a section of does/cows/ewes/females for selective breeding or dominance displays.

*** Sex Supply as defined by Donna Hughes, and others who seek to cordon off the herd.

Feminist suffrage parade in New York City, May...

Feminist Suffragettes parading in New York City. Wearing White was popular in the early part of the American century, with both feminists, and the Ku Klux Klan. Image via Wikipedia

Sweden isn’t just known for sex-negative feminism, and  false rape reporting anymore; they also persecute, and prosecute  legal sex workers.

Sweden, known for exports of  prudery, mackerel, lefsa, and now,  false feminism (fauxminism),  creates sex negative women like Anna Ardin and Sofia Wilen, who are only one or two pieces in a war against women and women’s sexual rights.

Swedish researchers Susanne Dodillet and Petra Östergren, point out in a recent study entitled The Swedish Sex Purchase Act: Claimed Success and Documented Effects, that legislation that was designed to help women actually hurts them.

Anna Ardin is the woman who accused Julian Assange of rape. She is just one example of sex negative feminism in action.

As if Ardin and  Wilen’s false rape conspiracy againstJUlian Assange, and their collaboration with sexist, and police-state feminism weren’t enough, we now find that sex workers in Sweden are threatened by sex negative female leaders.

It seems that feminism(s)—are in the third wave of “attaining capital and harnessing the machinery of power” like all socialist communist movements, and feminism has come of age, repressing the rights, and criminalizing the behaviors of their own allies—the women in the trenches, who actually are the ‘product’ that is, in the Marxist paradigm ” directly for use.”

The problem is, all those gender feminists and radfems can’t seem to circumscribe women’s bodies enough to keep the sex supply in their own sweaty hands.[ here is a link to a very bitter and controlling Donna Hughes Sex Supply thesis]

Sofia Wilen scoping out her next victim,. This is the 'aha' moment when he realized it is THAT Sofia Wilen that he's been 'dating.'

.

In the case of Ardin and Wilen, and utilizing a gender feminist, lesbian prosecutor, they went to war against Wikileak’s and documents which demonstrated how the United States was deliberately killing journalists. But in their war against Assange, they also minimized the impact of the simple truth that being alive and ‘raped’ is better than being really, really dead—forever.

Have you ever noticed how the so-called feminists/fauxminists only seem to care about filing rape claims against men who are on the left, or progressive men? It seems predatory to me, and sort of disingenuous, considering the point at hand: egalitarian and truly shared power. Not that shared power has any place in feminist dialogue.

But you can read more about how women make war, enact laws, and violate other women’s rights and sexuality, and sexual choices over here.

Despite the gendered assumption that children are the legally assumed property of women ( like a car, a truck, a house or a dildo), the article points out the harm of such legislation against women, and the threat to women’s tendencies to pimp each other, and feministe.us points out that

“Most disturbingly, the strict pimping laws apply to people who live with sex workers (the good old ‘living off the earnings’ schtick) which may include partners and even sex workers’ children. There have been cases in Sweden already where sex workers have had their grownup children charged with pimping because they were living with them and not paying rent. Anti sex work feminists, this is your legislation that you claim does not harm us. This is the danger of treating sex workers like we are not part of our communities and families. It is not feminist to support legislation that punishes women by targeting their children.”

Sex negative feminism, and it’s angry, irrational, man hating proponents are a threat to all human beings, not least of which is that it inserts a female who is a dick (or uses a fake dick; a legal dick; or a phallus philosophy) in the place of a man who is a dick, but at least, a real one–which makes me wonder: What kind of dick do these women in power speak for?

Seems a bit regressive, and anti-woman, like other sex-supply competing philosophies, but in new clothing.

Certainly not the phallic power of women who own,  and control their OWN bodies—and maybe yours too.  And never mind the fact that these same women raise sons who get sucked into and die in internet-nationalist wars, while their daughters remain alive—after all, even Swedish, gender- lesbian prosecutors must protect their sex- supply.

My best edumecated guess is that this breed of second to third wave feminism speaks for, and panders for Internationalist bankster*-dicks, who are pumping hard at Sweden’s food supply, and uses Sweden to continue to supply rising quantities of food and  cheap vodka to the international market.

International banksters have no one definite gender, but always seem to interfere in local and national male-female relationships—collaborating with and using women who are big pussies, those women allied with a bunch of dicks, and too afraid to do the hard work of gender-unification, and re-start the revolution.

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

America's Latest Inflation Crisis: Sex Trafficking StatisticsSometimes you feel like you’re the only one who notices the war that is being waged against truth, and sometimes, you don’t. Sex trafficking statistics are feuling an unholy-holy war against reason and against women, sex positive feminists, and children.

Lies from some ‘feminists’ defeat the hard work done by actual feminists, and do nothing to save women and children from exploitation, and everything to ally that brand of deceptive feminism with police and state power.

Worse, it puts that kind of feminist ever closer to your children.

Sex education, legalized prostitution, and birth control programs do everything to help women and children, and sex positive feminists.

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below: