Posts Tagged ‘female pimps’


This critical paper by Susanne Dodillet and Petra Ostergren is a bedrock of critical analysis of the hypocrisy of gender feminist reality constructs, gate keeping, and selective truth telling, and an analysis of the sloppy science of sex-negative fauxminists. This and a host of other discrepancies in truth telling have sex positive feminists taking note of the drives of sex negative, gender feminist assaults against women’s rights.

Gender feminists are actively engaged in “marketing to women”, and women’s rights, while having a net effect of leveraging, and then actually “marketing women” or in the least, selling them to power and power structures, circumventing women’s rights, and choices and womens abilities to define themselves:
The study further emphasizes the discrepancy between gender and radical feminist interpretations of the data, which negates( renders negative) the reality that ACTUAL sex workers face. Academics, politicians, and social gatekeepers who make their living from talking about sex workers, or those claiming moral high ground by falsely claiming–and ironically paternalistically/ maternalistically*  claiming that they speak for all women do not accurately or honestly represent the anecdotal facts of the sex workers experiences or the views of society at large. Notice the prominence of a “marketing strategy” below:

Most notably, the research that gender feminists used to lobby for the law, and to circumscribe other women’s bodies was flawed, non-factual, sloppy, and typical of a trend in feminist literature, science, and statistical evidence creation.

Others have noted in the critique of the law that its foundation was marked by deception, and current work was looking at the typical and egregious gender feminist biases and-


Equity feminists and other social critics are not alone in noticing the “herding effect**” of gender feminist involvement in the rhetoric of choice, with a direct and linear goal of “controlling the sex supply***.”  Nor are women, sex workers, and ordinary observers alone in noticing that the net effect of such two-faced laws and the studies that are funded in their name is to benefit a few at the expense of many.

More insidiously, this particular crop of ‘feminists’ have a stated goal of harm reduction, but flagrantly cause harm, according to the Swedish social work model of harm reduction strategies in social work:

The Swedish Model of prostitution is a dismal failure because gender feminists seek to gain exclusive access to the courts, the laws, and women’s bodies by falsely, and harmfully manipulating data, selectively promoting sex for sale, and effectively, and detrimentally,  limiting sex workers rights and sexual choices.


Or, in other words, they sure are re a bunch of phoney dicks, chasing the skirts of women and children in Sweden.
*Microsoft spell checker recognizes paternalistically as a word, but DOES NOT recognize maternalistically as a word!  In the interests of fairness, spell checker also does not recognize the word “phoney”.

**Herding effect is when bulls, or cows cordon off a section of does/cows/ewes/females for selective breeding or dominance displays.

*** Sex Supply as defined by Donna Hughes, and others who seek to cordon off the herd.

Feminist suffrage parade in New York City, May...

Feminist Suffragettes parading in New York City. Wearing White was popular in the early part of the American century, with both feminists, and the Ku Klux Klan. Image via Wikipedia

Sweden isn’t just known for sex-negative feminism, and  false rape reporting anymore; they also persecute, and prosecute  legal sex workers.

Sweden, known for exports of  prudery, mackerel, lefsa, and now,  false feminism (fauxminism),  creates sex negative women like Anna Ardin and Sofia Wilen, who are only one or two pieces in a war against women and women’s sexual rights.

Swedish researchers Susanne Dodillet and Petra Östergren, point out in a recent study entitled The Swedish Sex Purchase Act: Claimed Success and Documented Effects, that legislation that was designed to help women actually hurts them.

Anna Ardin is the woman who accused Julian Assange of rape. She is just one example of sex negative feminism in action.

As if Ardin and  Wilen’s false rape conspiracy againstJUlian Assange, and their collaboration with sexist, and police-state feminism weren’t enough, we now find that sex workers in Sweden are threatened by sex negative female leaders.

It seems that feminism(s)—are in the third wave of “attaining capital and harnessing the machinery of power” like all socialist communist movements, and feminism has come of age, repressing the rights, and criminalizing the behaviors of their own allies—the women in the trenches, who actually are the ‘product’ that is, in the Marxist paradigm ” directly for use.”

The problem is, all those gender feminists and radfems can’t seem to circumscribe women’s bodies enough to keep the sex supply in their own sweaty hands.[ here is a link to a very bitter and controlling Donna Hughes Sex Supply thesis]

Sofia Wilen scoping out her next victim,. This is the 'aha' moment when he realized it is THAT Sofia Wilen that he's been 'dating.'

.

In the case of Ardin and Wilen, and utilizing a gender feminist, lesbian prosecutor, they went to war against Wikileak’s and documents which demonstrated how the United States was deliberately killing journalists. But in their war against Assange, they also minimized the impact of the simple truth that being alive and ‘raped’ is better than being really, really dead—forever.

Have you ever noticed how the so-called feminists/fauxminists only seem to care about filing rape claims against men who are on the left, or progressive men? It seems predatory to me, and sort of disingenuous, considering the point at hand: egalitarian and truly shared power. Not that shared power has any place in feminist dialogue.

But you can read more about how women make war, enact laws, and violate other women’s rights and sexuality, and sexual choices over here.

Despite the gendered assumption that children are the legally assumed property of women ( like a car, a truck, a house or a dildo), the article points out the harm of such legislation against women, and the threat to women’s tendencies to pimp each other, and feministe.us points out that

“Most disturbingly, the strict pimping laws apply to people who live with sex workers (the good old ‘living off the earnings’ schtick) which may include partners and even sex workers’ children. There have been cases in Sweden already where sex workers have had their grownup children charged with pimping because they were living with them and not paying rent. Anti sex work feminists, this is your legislation that you claim does not harm us. This is the danger of treating sex workers like we are not part of our communities and families. It is not feminist to support legislation that punishes women by targeting their children.”

Sex negative feminism, and it’s angry, irrational, man hating proponents are a threat to all human beings, not least of which is that it inserts a female who is a dick (or uses a fake dick; a legal dick; or a phallus philosophy) in the place of a man who is a dick, but at least, a real one–which makes me wonder: What kind of dick do these women in power speak for?

Seems a bit regressive, and anti-woman, like other sex-supply competing philosophies, but in new clothing.

Certainly not the phallic power of women who own,  and control their OWN bodies—and maybe yours too.  And never mind the fact that these same women raise sons who get sucked into and die in internet-nationalist wars, while their daughters remain alive—after all, even Swedish, gender- lesbian prosecutors must protect their sex- supply.

My best edumecated guess is that this breed of second to third wave feminism speaks for, and panders for Internationalist bankster*-dicks, who are pumping hard at Sweden’s food supply, and uses Sweden to continue to supply rising quantities of food and  cheap vodka to the international market.

International banksters have no one definite gender, but always seem to interfere in local and national male-female relationships—collaborating with and using women who are big pussies, those women allied with a bunch of dicks, and too afraid to do the hard work of gender-unification, and re-start the revolution.