Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

You might have missed this ground shattering piece of journalism about the widespread rape of men in the Congo while you were occupied with immature and divisive conversations about young white women on elevators, the death of third wave, man-beating feminist Amy Winehouse, or the Obama shuffle to the right in matters of both domestic policy, dropping the ball on both the budget, and the treatment of “terrorists”.

But remember how hard last wave feminists were wishing, hoping, and praying that men get raped?

They got their wish.

But men get raped all the time, and nobody gives a shit—except the men who are literally bleeding out of their asses. And when men get raped, it often spells doom for relationships, support networks, and medical help; much less faith in women as allies.

The rape of men

Sexual violence is one of the most horrific weapons of war, an instrument of terror used against women. Yet huge numbers of men are also victims. In this harrowing report, Will Storr travels to Uganda to meet traumatised survivors, and reveals how male rape is endemic in many of the world’s conflicts

male-rape-victim-uganda

“The organisations working on sexual violence don’t talk about it:” Chris Dolan, director of the Refugee Law Project. Photograph: Will Storr for the Observer
TESTIMONY OF MALE VICTIM OF CONGO RAPE: “Today, despite his hospital treatment, Jean Paul still bleeds when he walks. Like many victims, the wounds are such that he’s supposed to restrict his diet to soft foods such as bananas, which are expensive, and Jean Paul can only afford maize and millet.”

Statistics on the rape of men are almost non-existent in the feminized, westernized world, and even rarer in war torn regions, despite the available resources, and agencies that could help combat rape.
The Refugee Law Project, based out of Makerere University in Kampala, Uganda is one of the startlingly few agencies that have ever compiled statistics on the subject, despite the billions of dollars spent on that exact topic here in America, every year.

RLP’s gender officer Salome Atim reports that, in addition to the world wide denial of the existence of men who are rape victims—along with a host of other violence directed at them, and the incredible lengths to which western feminists have gone to suppress the data-wives who discover their husbands have been raped most often leave them.

“They ask me: ‘So now how am I going to live with him? As what? Is this still a husband? Is it a wife?’ They ask, ‘If he can be raped, who is protecting me?’ There’s one family I have been working closely with in which the husband has been raped twice. When his wife discovered this, she went home, packed her belongings, picked up their child and left. Of course that brought down this man’s heart.”
One need look no further than to Americas academic culture, science, and scientists, to note the incredibly disturbing trend in America, and the west in general to minimize or deny the pain that men endure in regards to rape is a social construct with damning effects.

The Guardian—the same paper that had the courage to publish Wikileaks documents, points out that “It’s not just in East Africa that these stories remain unheard. One of the few academics to have looked into the issue in any detail is Lara Stemple, of the University of California’s Health and Human Rights Law Project. Her study Male Rape and Human Rights notes incidents of male sexual violence as a weapon of wartime or political aggression in countries such as Chile, Greece, Croatia, Iran, Kuwait, the former Soviet Union and the former Yugoslavia.”

Twenty-one per cent of Sri Lankan males who were seen at a London torture treatment centre [sic] reported sexual abuse while in detention. In El Salvador, 76% of male political prisoners surveyed in the 1980s described at least one incidence of sexual torture. A study of 6,000 concentration-camp inmates in Sarajevo found that 80% of men reported having been raped.”
As well, many if not all reports of rape-culture formation directed at males has been left out of the literature as pertains to American social policy, as in the case of the CIA’s projects MKULTRA and MKMONARCH.[…]

These numbers are not at all unusual, nor is evidence that men are rape victims in any way an unknown phenomenon, as Jewish and Christian culture has long been known for sexually mutilating men in war and in times of peace[biblical quote about foreskins]; but what is remarkable is how hard and how desperately American women’s groups, feminists, and liberals in general ( the same people who brought us the rape culture analysis) have worked hard to minimize this fact, and keep it out of the literature.

And unlike women who survive rape, male survivors are secondarily and summarily punished in myriad ways.

The Guardian reports that “In Uganda, survivors are at risk of arrest by police, as they are likely to assume that they’re gay – a crime in this country and in 38 of the 53 African nations. They will probably be ostracized [sic] by friends, rejected by family and turned away by the UN and the myriad international NGOs that are equipped, trained and ready to help women. They are wounded, isolated and in danger.”

Making matters worse, documentary evidence of the rape of men is always overlooked, and underfunded, “although a rare 2010 survey, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, found that 22% of men and 30% of women in Eastern Congo reported conflict-related sexual violence.”

Whereas second wave feminists lauded and oddly, laughed at and approved of women cutting off men’s penises[..], and adulated the original Vagina Monologues rape of a 13 year old girl by a woman, they ensured that the rape of men would continue as a social policy, and even today, work against the safety of women, and the men who know them.

Stemple says that “International human rights law leaves out men in nearly all instruments designed to address sexual violence,” she continues. “The UN Security Council Resolution 1325 in 2000 treats wartime sexual violence as something that only impacts on women and girls… Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recently announced $44m to implement this resolution. Because of its entirely exclusive focus on female victims, it seems unlikely that any of these new funds will reach the thousands of men and boys who suffer from this kind of abuse. Ignoring male rape not only neglects men, it also harms women by reinforcing a viewpoint that equates ‘female’ with ‘victim’, thus hampering our ability to see women as strong and empowered.”

Based on Stemple’s data, the preponderance of women invested in rape prevention and social reform, one could even posit that the rape of men is a deliberate social policy in all structures of power, because whether that power is female, or male, it leads to rape.

Other indicators, like the perpetuation of the American prison system and its enormous growth have been piggy-backed onto the political success of women’s groups in generating funding for public fear campaigns that are in essence, a marriage between the police and women’s groups, like the Take Back the Night campaign, or the current round of inflated statistics on sexual exploitation .

American prisons are rape factories, by design, and either women’s groups in America have worked hard to ensure that they stay that way, women have chosen to be part of a campaign of violence against men that is so insidious it demands the suspension of belief in women’s movements.

Ironically, George W. Bush, a white male and a conservative Republican who upheld the rapes of men at Abu Ghraib—as did many Democrats–has been the only world leader to ever publicly go on record and denounce prison rape.

“Vibrated in the wrong place” Is there a right and wrong anymore, anyways?

Should we keep kids off of Youtube? Or should we encourage “cell phone awareness,” especially as pertains to the vibrate function? Option B is to let your unoccupied daughter explore for herself, with the help of her girl-friendy friends and her internet FBI BF/GF? If you ask me, they are both potentially equally creepy.
And isn’t there a good kids book to read somewhere that isn’t about Harry Potter and his vibrating broom? Oh, the good ol’ days of the Hardy boys, and Nancy Drew games…

America's Latest Inflation Crisis: Sex Trafficking StatisticsSometimes you feel like you’re the only one who notices the war that is being waged against truth, and sometimes, you don’t. Sex trafficking statistics are feuling an unholy-holy war against reason and against women, sex positive feminists, and children.

Lies from some ‘feminists’ defeat the hard work done by actual feminists, and do nothing to save women and children from exploitation, and everything to ally that brand of deceptive feminism with police and state power.

Worse, it puts that kind of feminist ever closer to your children.

Sex education, legalized prostitution, and birth control programs do everything to help women and children, and sex positive feminists.

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

A real time example of what it looks like when reason fails in discussions about sex and gender is taking place over at Greg Laden‘s blog at Scienceblogs.com. 

Or, in plain English, a battle of the sexes is taking place–gender warporn, and academic warporn.

Here is a live feed with a commentator, discussing the difference between child brains and adult brains. Notice the woman slapping the child/man at about 2:55 into the commentary.

Many of the women in the discussion are upset because men ‘just don’t get it’ when it comes to them being afraid of being raped, while many men think women just don’t get it about men dying, being killed, being incarcerated, and ALSO being raped, and assaulted as part of possibility of the every day life of being male.

In other words, white female privilege is again at war with males who are less privileged, while males who are privileged are also at war with those lesser privileged males. This is a historic pattern, as white female privilege goes hand in hand with imperialism. White female pseudo feminism is cultural imperialism.

On the other side of the debate is a woman, Abbie Smith, aka ERV,  who is a ” graduate student studying the molecular and biochemical evolution of HIV,” and she is of the opinion that women whining about being afraid to be in an elevator with a man are, well, whiners.

And lurking around the fringes of the debate is notoriously sag-titted misandrist and false rape proponent P.Z. Meyers, who is a militarist, and an apologist for the police state.

Smith’s audience is mostly younger males that have been labeled, or ostracized from the gender feminists discussion at Laden’s blog and elsewhere.

Most importantly, notice that her blog is immensely more popular. I make note of that because  all of them are making money generating web traffic at the expense of males who feel they have been deprived of a ‘seat at the table.’ In first insulting males, and secondly, by capitalizing on male anger over insult, they together wage war against men.

Or, put in laymans terms, their are two old reasonable wealthy or secure white guys, both professors of  Marxist deconstructions of reality, who are circling as best as they can to keep up with two young white girls, andpotentially any other girls who feel ‘safe’ in the discussion.

The old feminists called that patriarchy; the new ones call it feminism. Hmmm.

Same as it ever was, with a twist: these types of people, and these type of debates lead to a domestic climate of fear, feed into police state ideology, and cause men to be incarcerated at incredibly high rates; all while providing a smokescreen against the backdrop of America’s imperialistic internationalist  invasions on five fronts that are actually killing children, and causing rape.

Or, put another way, chimpanzees do the same thing. Bands of chimps are patriarchal, and they hunt ‘outgroup’ males, with the approval of females.

Or, put yet another way: I might be wrong in my hypotheses that feminists are bonobos, with so much actual violence going around out there–violence that they instigate, or perpetuate against males.

Domestic gender war masks actual international war, and causes its own collateral damage. Women, then, are integral to the causation of war and violence.

What?? The evul turrorist’s are employing the same techniques that Americans have historically used to propagandize children, the even more evul cartoon??

Sounds all to familiar. Here is a Disney cartoon about Americas war machine.
OOoops. I meant to say Nazi Germanies war machine, which, like America, sought to attach itself to children’s minds, a sort of mental molestation.

In war porn, and violence provoking rhetoric, the evil “other” needs to be controlled, marginalized, and dehumanized. Here in America it is second nature to not question the propaganda that is aimed at children ( and adults via Family Guy, etc.), and Americans are known to not think it through when it comes to the affect that is created in their conscious minds by propaganda.

Cartoons begin the ‘un-thinking’  process which leads to war being accepted as normal; us versus them.

Hopefully Al Qaida will create a cartoon about the effects of depleted uranium on children–but I doubt it, because the minute I hear about new media in under-developed countries, or old media being applied to new audiences, I smell a rat–or a Mouse.

On the surface, the article seems to appeal to all people, in an almost egalitarian manner, despite the fact that it just a snapshot in time, from one locality. And of course, it is a selective example wherein not only do women appear to be greater in ‘victimhood’ but also it compares the existing notions and false presumption (women are victims of DV at greater rates than men) against the facts of DV ( Fiebert’s careful three decade study of DV on initiation and follow through of women’s violence directed at men.)

In brutally simple terms, homicide is a statistical outlier—an extreme that is almost not worth noting.

Now, the facts: in this one study of deaths caused by DV, men lose, clearly, in the common imagination of the layperson, because obviously, more women died in this example. The author then goes on to break down the examples and we find that—surprise!—the men who killed women were abusers, and the women who killed men were no doubt driven to it, by being egregiously abused, while many men also killed themselves ( hot topic in feminist rhetoric ‘men kill themselves to hurt women’—new lows in the debate, while other feminists take a pro-active stance acknowledging that men’s suicide rates are a serious topic…).

What is missing in this particular snapshot is that we have to imagine what could drive a man to murder—and we do not impute males with the same propensity to kill a mate with long term abuse suffered by those males. But enough about this snapshot- one of millions out there that attempt to circumvent the issue of aggression with extreme examples—where are the facts in practice as documented by Fiebert?

Here is what comes next, after the article, when the comments begin:

Notice how the women first ask for a particular male; then, bait the hook—as if men are prey– female two says “wait for it…” as if men are out there somewhere, just dying to hear such dismissive rhetoric—that rhetoric inscribed upon male bodies by women’s lifelong deliberate denial of male awareness of the female voice and it’s impending violence, such as Fiebert has had all along, but which seldom get attention because they are facts, not vitriol, or passive aggressive verbal violence directed at one particular sex.

This style of communication, by definition, is aggressive.

The question the author asks is itself a cloaked threat against men, asking not ‘what can we do about violence,’ but rather, implying that men are the cause of “their own” violence, and then aggressively attempting to provoke an equally aggressive reaction, while neatly overlooking the percentage of men killed by other men that women brought into their lives in the form of boyfriends, police powers, and social workers—a form of institutionalized violence that women do not face.

The example above IS an example of aggression by definition, and an example of the typical aggressive female to male gender-baiting that occurs all over America, every day; it is also an example of the third category of porn: academic porn; semi-informed, or semi interested perspectives about serious issues that masquerade as facts, while dismissing academic empirical evidence that contests the purportedly academic positions.

But what about this one snapshot example that actually examines aggression, and death caused by the dictionary definition of aggression? Not much of it. This study examines one example of homicide—and curiously minimizes the use by women of third parties to enable homicide of males, via boyfriends, and the police. It has virtually no intent other than to victimize males with statistical snapshots, and does nothing to address female aggression against males. It is one more form of gender warporn, and its net effect is to further violence.

The academic appeal is directed in the form that is dummied down and directed at those who do not have access to the entirety of a discussion( in this case the gender based, and separatist feminist based, deconstructionist and quasi-liberal, police infrastructure, and biased opinions about what constitute acts of aggression).

In other words, an early casualty of the debate about domestic violence was the simple facts that women commit many acts of violence in relationships, as Fieberts statistics clearly show.

Acts of aggression can be anything from the person at the grocery store parking their car with its bumper touching yours, to the guy on the bus who sits down without asking, and loudly blares his Ipod; to the person who insults you or demeans you on a daily basis, or the woman who reminds you how quickly the police or her other boyfriend will come if she calls them, no matter what she did to you.

Acts of aggression can also be women depending upon men to not speak up in a relationship when women verbally, sexually, or physically threaten them; or depend on other men to perpetuate the cycle of and by the time a man wakes up in such a situation, it is usually too late.

The best part about these academic websites that prostitute objectivity? They almost always seem to end their threads on the exact note they want, like orchestrated missives to half-wits. This post ended, predictably, with some woman upholding some man who died protecting the right of women to hide their violence behind violent men who protect ‘her’ children—and I don’t have the time to unpack that baggage right now. But last time I checked, we were not chimpanzees.

Men die more often when women use other men to fight battles that women start.

*Sage is a linguistic dictionary, based on WordNet http://wordnet.princeton.edu/ It is based on how English speakers actually use the language, and is NOT to be used to determine what the “correct” or “incorrect” use of the English language is, because political and social trends are fickle, financed, and flawed, whereas the democratic use of language, and common peoples understanding of that language, is democracy in action.

** SUMMARY:  The collection is entitled REFERENCES EXAMINING ASSAULTS BY WOMEN ON THEIR SPOUSES OR MALE PARTNERS: AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY. This bibliography examines 282 scholarly investigations: 218 empirical studies and 64 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners.  The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 369,800.

===================================================

For anyone who is not an academic, ‘school educated person’, here is what I am saying above the non-arbitrary line above you.

Book smart people use the discussion about domestic violence to put more police in your neighborhoods, while keeping you out of their neighborhoods. Academics are people who have college degrees, and write stuff and try to get paid for what they write. What they write is funded-financed—by saying the right things to the government in order to get a paycheck from the government.

These people make a ton of money by talking about how women are abused, and by not talking about how men are abused. And they all hate Jerry Springer.

Remember Jerry Springer, and all those violent women? At least he showed us the truth about women who your man goes to when you are pregnant, because talking to each other about sex isn’t something we are taught to do, and prostitution isn’t legal in America.

Women who hit men, and children; and women who cheat, and then call the police to look like victims are all on Jerry Springer, but the book smart people hate him.

Remember all those women who had babies by a bunch of men? Do you ever wonder why your man doesn’t come home? And when he does do you want to just kill him? The girl on Springer is the one who used your man to get a piece of his paycheck, just like academics get government money. All of us get used by them when they don’t tell the truth.

Do you sometimes want to smack your woman upside her head because she spent two hours talking to the guy at the Waffle House? It’s probably because you don’t have anyone to talk to, because some people like you actually work for a living, and book smart people use words that could put you in jail, where they should be.

But simply put, many women make money by accusing men of crimes, and other women don’t talk about it. Lots of people beat each other up; but only men go to jail for it—because the people who write books about violence get money when they only talk about mens violence. And the cops and academics and social workers are all off fucking each other while your local main street is eaten up by Walmart.

They don’t give a shit about you, and they use the troubles that men and women have in relationships to make money.

So, if you need help in a violent situation, here is a number you can call 1-800-EAT-SHIT, because they are not here to help you.

 

Hot, sweaty, all-day-long monkey fucking. Monkey fucking, lesbian monkey fucking, mother and infant fucking, bad aunties molesting their nephews and nieces, older women and younger men. Hot African monkey fucking; maternal incest, women who have sex with children. Hot monkey butt sex, all day long.

Porn language is vulgar, but more appropriate for children than flag draped caskets, or social movements that give birth to soldiers instead of scholars.

VULGARITY is a word that upper classes use to oppress the language, speech, and bodies of the lower classes,while upper classes wage wars everywhere, and kill children, using those same peoples bodies. But not all monkey societies use flags, or flag draped caskets, which are more vulgar than language that humans use.

Porn keywords are vulgar, and necessary symbols of culture. But porn keywords don’t always tell the whole tale, and you never know what you might find when you click a link. For instance, what do you get with you cross feminists with ‘fisting’? Here is the answer.

The highly pornographic video above is about bonobos, a tribe of smaller chimpanzees that are led by women, not men. Er…led by females, not males– that fuck to solve all of their social problems. This female led group fucks everyone, all the time, even their own daughters, but never their sons–they leave that to their sisters.

Some scientists say that this adaptation–fucking instead of fighting in times of high stress–relieves social tensions, and keeps the tribe together.Violence is relatively rare in that society–so the scientists say–and we all know what they say about cultural relativism!!

The video is pornographic by definition because it has no literary, creative, or scientific merit despite generations of monkey-fucking porn watchers arguing that these type of videos teach us about ourselfs. Yeah, right, like I want to rub my pussy, my cock, or my ass against something, and then eat till I’m sleepy, and in a snuggling mood…

Bonobos, called pan paniscus, are closely related to humans and chimpanzees–called pan troglodytes (the ape you see at the zoo, or the one who tore this woman’s face off–plastic surgery is soooo NOT feminist… )

Whereas human males and females have a sliding hierarchical scale of when how and with whom to use violence, and chimpanzees use it by default, bonobo’s are a bunch of fuckers, and they solve problems with cunnilingus, pussy to pussy rubbing, blowjobs, fucking and ass rubs.

They are the only matriarchal apes in the whole world, and they have sex with each other, sex with their young, and sex sex sex all day long, especially when food is near. Food is like monkey money*, and it makes them horny.

Some people say they were named wrong, and they should have been called pan promiscuous….or feminist monkeys–which would be incorrect because most feminists believe in violence, and only have sex with people who have lots of monkey money, and chimpanzee friends.

It is scientifically quite possible that we descend in some way from this form of ape, as our DNA is 97-98.5% the same! However, you can observe differences in human behavior and decide for yourself if the people you know are more chimp like, or more bonobo like.

Groups of men and women that center themselves around violence are more likely chimps, and groups that center themselves around sex are more like bonobos.Oh, and of course, who outsource their violence to chimps.

And I am just monkeying around and playing with– examining- language and its symbolic value, but incest is a serious topic. So if you know a girl who is a victim of maternal incest or are a therapist engaged in treating victims of maternal incest, here is a good book for them or you to read, by Beverly Ogilvie that covers the topic extensively.

If you are a boy who has been sexually abused by bonobos, good luck–no one believes you exist.

America drops depleted uranium on children, which is probably better than what American CIA did to American children when they fed kids uranium for breakfast.

baby-fatimah-ahmed-born-with-two-heads-in-fallujah

America protects children from exploitation by making them so scary looking that even Americans no longer want to exploit them.

America: keeping children safe from exploitation.

America: protecting kids by re-engineering genetic codes so that children become un-exploitable

By creating two headed babies, children born with cancer, or born with their intestines and other guts hanging out of their bodies;and arm-less and leg-less children with leukemia, America can protect children from sexual exploitation, and guarantee that middle eastern kids are too scary looking to be used to make sexual pornography, or be sold into slavery.

By ensuring that heir mothers and fathers are exposed to Americas depleted uranium fields in Iraq, Afghanistan, Bosnia, and now Libya, America can guarantee these kids freedom–from their own lives.

Americas child-warporn is a huge industry. You might even have money invested in it. In fact, you would be surprised how much of what the United States is doing to these kids benefits the big pharmaceutical companies, the AMA, and you.

Freedom is guaranteeing Americans the right to NOT have to see what  kind of social and genetic engineering is being performed on children overseas, while ignoring what America does to children at home.

However, if you suspect a child is being abused by someone other than American social policy, the FBI or the CIA, report it to the American FBI–they love to investigate naked children, but seem to drop the ball when it comes to investigating  the war crimes that Americans commit against children.

Caricature on "The great epidemic of porn...

Image via Wikipedia

Recognizing that we [exist] are trapped in a society that circumscribes, coerces, violates and exploits our bodies as obstacles or as commodities through the co-option of our consent; and recognizing the inherent corruption and co-option of human nature due to the social compact of religious, ideological and capitalist systems, we protest.

We identify two kinds of pornographic representations of the body that the human being is forced to interact within. War porn and Sex porn—although a possible third kind of pornography exists, which is the co-opted academic debate and scholarship that seeks to rationalize, capitalize, or justify its existence through argumentation in favor of one or the other types of pornography.

We refer to this type of possible porn as “Academic porn,” the kind of dialogue that incrementalizes the urgency for liberation and human rights of one person over another person in an attempt to justify grants, fellowships, and academic notoriety, while quashing of other types of dialogues.

Definitionally, we use the term pornography derived from the freeware, open source dictionary “The Sage” to mean “creative activity (writing or pictures or films) of no literary or artistic value other than to stimulate sexual desire”. However, we suggest that all alleged pornographic imagery is literary and potentially artistic, but most importantly, discussion worthy, which is our intended act against the confines of a definitionally murderous, war based society.

In light of that definition, we believe that there is no such thing as actual sexual pornography, but rather, only debates about social control and power structures that limit the discussions about the co-option of our bodies, and the bodies of others who have been used by such a systemic, dualistic and war-pornographic culture.

We suggest a moratorium on the pursuit or prosecution of sexual pornography related crimes to limit the scope to actual perpetrators, their associates, and their accomplices, and in its place a deeper analysis of the under-explored topic of war pornography. As well we are suggesting prosecution for war crimes by nations, and leaders of individual nations that commit them, instead of shaming human beings for sexual choices, portrayals, discussions and displays.

The issues of consent, patriarchal versus matriarchal values, child versus adult sexuality, and especially homo versus hetero sexuality are constant themes that are routinely brought up in discussions of sexual pornography, and I maintain that cannot be properly analyzed in times or in places where rulers use our own and others sexual bodies and sexual shaming against us, while they and their warporn oriented minions commit the ultimate attrocities of war-pornographic murder, death, actual disease, and “otherness” perpetuation.

We rebel at complicity with their definition and adherence to the idea that human images, portrayals, and discussions of sex in all of its forms has no ‘literary or artistic value other than to stimulate sexual desire,’ because such a definition draws a false and arbitrary line between our bodies and ourselves. Sexuality is not seperable from humanity, yet neither is all sexual thought, ideology, or feeling a stimulation—it is also inseperable from our experience, imaginations, and our bodies.

So, definitionally, we take the stand that warporn is their means of primary control over our bodies, and that sexporn is merely a tool of delineating a boundary through that body—of dividing and conquering—of discerning those who will or won’t comply with the capitalist murder agenda; that defining the sexual body is in itself a primary abrogation against individual will and intention, whether sexual or not.

Additionally, we take the stand that males are primary victims of warporn, and females the primary victims of sexporn, each with their own forms of danger and suffering attached, but that warporn is the more dangerous and socially maladapted and malevolent of the two, as death, torture, rape, imprisonment, and lifelong physical and mental injury is more lasting, and acknowleging its effects is more detrimental to the health of our society.

I suggest that their war on our bodies cannot be avoided, but that we can be understood between ourselves, and eventually remove them from power. The lens which we employ is analytical from a literary sense; sociological, sexological, anthropological, psychological and evolutionary from an academic perspective.

But the war on our sexual bodies is pure propaganda, aimed at distracting us from the horror of what our nation is doing to other bodies with bombs, guns, depleted uranium, and death. I hope to help others defeat death, and live more vibrant life by recognizing how pornography affects us all.