Feminist suffrage parade in New York City, May...

Feminist Suffragettes parading in New York City. Wearing White was popular in the early part of the American century, with both feminists, and the Ku Klux Klan. Image via Wikipedia

Sweden isn’t just known for sex-negative feminism, and  false rape reporting anymore; they also persecute, and prosecute  legal sex workers.

Sweden, known for exports of  prudery, mackerel, lefsa, and now,  false feminism (fauxminism),  creates sex negative women like Anna Ardin and Sofia Wilen, who are only one or two pieces in a war against women and women’s sexual rights.

Swedish researchers Susanne Dodillet and Petra Östergren, point out in a recent study entitled The Swedish Sex Purchase Act: Claimed Success and Documented Effects, that legislation that was designed to help women actually hurts them.

Anna Ardin is the woman who accused Julian Assange of rape. She is just one example of sex negative feminism in action.

As if Ardin and  Wilen’s false rape conspiracy againstJUlian Assange, and their collaboration with sexist, and police-state feminism weren’t enough, we now find that sex workers in Sweden are threatened by sex negative female leaders.

It seems that feminism(s)—are in the third wave of “attaining capital and harnessing the machinery of power” like all socialist communist movements, and feminism has come of age, repressing the rights, and criminalizing the behaviors of their own allies—the women in the trenches, who actually are the ‘product’ that is, in the Marxist paradigm ” directly for use.”

The problem is, all those gender feminists and radfems can’t seem to circumscribe women’s bodies enough to keep the sex supply in their own sweaty hands.[ here is a link to a very bitter and controlling Donna Hughes Sex Supply thesis]

Sofia Wilen scoping out her next victim,. This is the 'aha' moment when he realized it is THAT Sofia Wilen that he's been 'dating.'

.

In the case of Ardin and Wilen, and utilizing a gender feminist, lesbian prosecutor, they went to war against Wikileak’s and documents which demonstrated how the United States was deliberately killing journalists. But in their war against Assange, they also minimized the impact of the simple truth that being alive and ‘raped’ is better than being really, really dead—forever.

Have you ever noticed how the so-called feminists/fauxminists only seem to care about filing rape claims against men who are on the left, or progressive men? It seems predatory to me, and sort of disingenuous, considering the point at hand: egalitarian and truly shared power. Not that shared power has any place in feminist dialogue.

But you can read more about how women make war, enact laws, and violate other women’s rights and sexuality, and sexual choices over here.

Despite the gendered assumption that children are the legally assumed property of women ( like a car, a truck, a house or a dildo), the article points out the harm of such legislation against women, and the threat to women’s tendencies to pimp each other, and feministe.us points out that

“Most disturbingly, the strict pimping laws apply to people who live with sex workers (the good old ‘living off the earnings’ schtick) which may include partners and even sex workers’ children. There have been cases in Sweden already where sex workers have had their grownup children charged with pimping because they were living with them and not paying rent. Anti sex work feminists, this is your legislation that you claim does not harm us. This is the danger of treating sex workers like we are not part of our communities and families. It is not feminist to support legislation that punishes women by targeting their children.”

Sex negative feminism, and it’s angry, irrational, man hating proponents are a threat to all human beings, not least of which is that it inserts a female who is a dick (or uses a fake dick; a legal dick; or a phallus philosophy) in the place of a man who is a dick, but at least, a real one–which makes me wonder: What kind of dick do these women in power speak for?

Seems a bit regressive, and anti-woman, like other sex-supply competing philosophies, but in new clothing.

Certainly not the phallic power of women who own,  and control their OWN bodies—and maybe yours too.  And never mind the fact that these same women raise sons who get sucked into and die in internet-nationalist wars, while their daughters remain alive—after all, even Swedish, gender- lesbian prosecutors must protect their sex- supply.

My best edumecated guess is that this breed of second to third wave feminism speaks for, and panders for Internationalist bankster*-dicks, who are pumping hard at Sweden’s food supply, and uses Sweden to continue to supply rising quantities of food and  cheap vodka to the international market.

International banksters have no one definite gender, but always seem to interfere in local and national male-female relationships—collaborating with and using women who are big pussies, those women allied with a bunch of dicks, and too afraid to do the hard work of gender-unification, and re-start the revolution.

Comments
  1. windy says:

    hello – on the subject of Sweden, you might find this controversy from a couple of years ago interesting.

    • pornonymous says:

      I tried to comment on your blog but I could not figure out the spam filter. Here is my initial response to what appears to be yet another assault against the integrity of “non-white, non-European” men from white women.

      The irony is that white women stood behind white men when they were lynching blacks for all of history, because they stood behind the British( and before that the Roman) power structure when ‘white men’ were being crucified. They stood in solidarity in the last round of wars when ‘brown men’ were getting tortured, and persecuted–but took the rhetorical stance that war is a mans problem. Irony nis that all the while they were scheming for more ‘social power’ while their own men were gone! That means more police, and more taxes.
      Sick….

      “This sounds like typical ‘white culture feminism’ attacking the brown people again. I have only given this a cursory look, but I will read up on it–and thank you for thelead! Also, as a side note, I am following Anna Ardin and Sofia Wilens distrous false rape accusations and assault agianst Julian Assange.

      I hope I am not out of place to say so, but whitewomen have certainly been used by “themselves” in a disastrous way buying into ‘feminism.’

      There is nothing positive for normal day to day working class women in feminism, and I hope that men who are “non-white” or non European begin talking about the social violence that they suffer at the hands of these racist, classist, and sexist white women.”

  2. windy says:

    hi – sorry, that’s not my blog but it was the only good summary of the affair in English that I could find – a lot of the commentary is in Swedish only. I agree that it seems to be about people confirming pre-existing biases. The book was reportedly used as a reference on domestic violence by politicians despite being largely confabulated, as it now appears.

    • pornonymous says:

      Gee whizz, your quick! I just realized you responded already!
      Well, yes, it does fit the pattern of feminist conflation, and deliberate statistical and evidential fraud. And it does no one any good–except the select few feminists who uphold such lies, and the police. They both get paid out of the deal, while the vast majority of people suffer. I just read that many young women are so offended at the tactics, lies and deceptions of feminists that they refuse to use the label

      If you want to see how the rape-violence conflation works, http://www.scienceblogs.com is full of ‘feminist’ vitriol that claims to be combating rape, in the thin disguise of stat counting and penny collecting.

      • windy says:

        yes, I’ve noticed… I found your blog through your comments on ERV. By the way, the links to the pdfs in your post seem to be broken?

      • pornonymous says:

        The links are broken? Wow, which ones?? I will look into that. I have been having some trouble with WordPresslately–don’t know why yet.
        Which .pdf’s did you want? I can re-link them all.

        Yeah–it’s time to flip the script on sci-blogs. They make real feminists, much less the idea of scientific inquiry, look bad.

      • pornonymous says:

        Hi Windy. I can only guess which .pdf’s are broken right now–but I am guessingit is the latest post? Here are Martin Fiebert, PhD, CSU stats on women committing more domestic violence from that post–not a .pdf, but a bad link.

        http://www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm

      • pornonymous says:

        Hi windy–I replied on the blog, an d also fixed the links, and the Ostergren piece is well worth the read Swedens sex laws, etc.

      • pornonymous says:

        Thanks again Windy–links are up again. I have no idea how they got broken.

      • windy says:

        thanks, I’ll check them out!

  3. […] pedophiles ( think NAMBLA for girls) and a host of other bizarre and angry manifestations that have a net effect of causing harm to children of all […]

What do You think about that?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s